Uber Accused of Withholding Documents in Sexual Assault Probes, Playing a ‘Cat and Mouse Game’

Uber, the popular ride-hailing company used by people all over the world, has come under scrutiny for its alleged failure to produce documents related to government probes into sexual assaults involving its drivers. Despite a court order giving Uber until January 31, 2024, to provide documents related to government investigations or inquiries into sexual assault claims, the company has been accused of playing a “cat and mouse game” by intentionally withholding crucial information. 

The Growing Issue of Rideshare Assault

In recent years, the rise of rideshare services has revolutionized transportation. However, numerous reports and allegations of rideshare assault have also surfaced, suggesting that Uber drivers have sexually assaulted passengers during rides. These incidents range from groping and harassment to more severe instances of rape and kidnapping.

Uber’s Alleged Failure to Implement Preventive Measures

The consolidated lawsuits in the Uber sexual assault MDL claim that Uber has been aware of the issue of rideshare assault involving its drivers but has failed to implement adequate policies to prevent such crimes. Plaintiffs argue that Uber prioritized rapid expansion and increased profits over passenger safety. They contend that Uber’s negligence in implementing thorough background checks, requiring biometric data from driver applicants, and using video cameras have contributed to the prevalence of sexual assaults.

Court Order for Document Production

In December 2023, the federal judge overseeing the Uber passenger sexual assault MDL, U.S. District Judge Charles R. Breyer, issued a court order requiring Uber to deliver “all documents defendants produced to legislative, regulatory, or enforcement entities in connection with government investigations or inquiries of Uber within the United States with respect to sexual assault, including attempted assaults.”

Uber was given until January 31 to comply with the court order. However, counsel for the plaintiffs recently informed the court that Uber has failed to do so. They claim that Uber has withheld certain documents, despite the clear directive to produce all relevant materials. The plaintiffs’ lawyer argued that Uber is playing a “cat and mouse game” by intentionally withholding information crucial to the litigation. 

Plaintiffs Seeking Assistance from the Court

During a recent Zoom hearing before U.S. Magistrate Judge Lisa J. Cisneros, a lawyer for the plaintiffs stated that Uber provided a list of documents but failed to include known investigations discovered through conversations with other plaintiffs’ counsel and extensive research. The lawyer requested the court’s assistance in securing the missing documents and ensuring that Uber complies with the court order.

Uber’s legal representation countered the plaintiffs’ claims, stating that the parties could have resolved the issue through direct communication. They argued that Uber is responsive to a patchwork of regulators across the 50 states and cannot be expected to produce every report on a day-to-day basis. Uber’s lawyers emphasized that the company has already provided over 2,000 pages of documents and is in compliance with the court order.

The Need for Clarity and Streamlined Dispute Resolution

Judge Cisneros acknowledged the ongoing dispute and expressed her inclination to issue another pretrial order that clarifies and streamlines the discovery dispute resolution process. She suggested requiring the parties to submit joint letters to the court, promoting efficient communication and resolution of outstanding issues. The judge urged the parties to meet and confer, emphasizing the importance of joint discovery letters.

The plaintiffs’ lawyer emphasized the significance of having a comprehensive list of investigations conducted by Uber. Without this list, Uber may object to the information gathered by the plaintiffs through their own investigation. The lawyer argued that the burden should not be placed on the plaintiffs to provide Uber with the necessary information. They called for Uber to fulfill its obligation to comply with the court order and produce the complete list of investigations.

Impact of Uber Assault Allegations on the Rideshare Industry

The Uber sexual assault MDL highlights the critical need for transparency and accountability in the rideshare industry. As the rideshare assault lawsuits against Uber and Lyft progress, it is essential to address the allegations of assault and ensure that appropriate measures are implemented to protect passengers. The outcome of these lawsuits may shape future regulations and safety standards for rideshare companies.

Rideshare Assault Lawsuit Information

Sexual assault lawsuits against Uber and Lyft are mounting as plaintiff attorneys push hard to keep the rideshare companies accountable for the sexual assaults, kidnappings, and injuries caused by drivers.
Scroll to Top